Showing posts with label green energy fail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green energy fail. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
I Want My $84.15... How About You?
I was blue, just as blue as I could be
Ev'ry day was a cloudy day for me
Then good luck came a-knocking at my door
Skies were gray but they're not gray anymore
Blue skies,
Smiling at me,
Nothing but blue skies,
Do I see...
-- Irving Berlin
Blue skies. Blue water. Green Algae. Very shiny 'flat surfaces'. Lithium Ion Battery packs (which catch fire on 787's - coincidentally approved to fly once more as of... earlier this week).
In 2008 President Barack Obama said that 'he' would 'create' 5,000,000 (a.k.a.: 5 Million) new jobs by directing Tax Payer money to renewable energy projects over the next 10 years. This, on its face is odd, as I believe a President's Term in office is only 4 years, vs. 5, but I can only assume he was 'rounding up' to ten from his 'electable' eight years.
As I cast my bloodshot eyes around the empty dining room on some non-descript date in May, 2013 - I perch once again before my trusty HP computer to see 'just how far we've come' (or perhaps, 'gone') achieving President Obama's vision of a Tax-Payer-Funded Green Economy..
All things considered, I should have never left the safety of my bedroom...
Okay, you didn't ask for it, but here it comes regardless!
The First Ever MoosRoom Green-Energy-Initiative Update (2013 Edition)!
(The houselights fall, the blue backdrop glows brightly, a singular spotlight sparks to life as a familiar man walks to the podium to update US on just exactly how we're doing 'going green'. It is at this point I realize that I am dreaming. The President is a 'bit busy' lately managing other failures of leadership and the overall decline of America. The man in the expensive suit morphs into a talking cow as the dream sequence begins anew...)
From the Institute for Energy Research, May 8, 2013: THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COMMITTED $11 MILLION PER JOB
Without much fanfare, the Department of Energy (DOE) recently updated the list of loan guarantee projects on its website. Unlike in 2008, when Barack Obama pledged to create 5 million jobs over 10 years by directing taxpayer funds toward renewable energy projects, there were no press conferences or stump speeches.
But the data are nonetheless revealing: for the over $26 billion committed since 2009, DOE Section 1703 and 1705 loan guarantees have created only 2,298 permanent jobs – that’s $11.45 million per job.
Well, 2,298 jobs 'created or saved' is certainly a step in the RIGHT direction when it comes to Green Energy job creation, but between you and me, I'm thinking that $11.45 MILLION per job is a wee bit expensive.
Sure, if it was something like $6 MILLION per job created, that would probably be okay, but almost $12 MILLION per job? Nah, I'm NOT loving it. At this pace, the President's 5 MILLION new jobs calculated at $11.45 MILLION per job is, um, let's see...
New Jobs x Cost per Job = Total Green Investment
5,000,000 x 11,450,000 = $ 57,250,000,000,000
Yes, just over $57 TRILLION dollars to create (or save!) Five Million Green Jobs.
Considering that the 2013 Federal Budget is set at $3.8 TRILLION, yeah, I'm not sure that we can raise (or create) enough tax dollars to pay for many more of these 'High Paying Jobs' the President speaks so fondly of during stump speeches.
Surely there ARE other positive Green Energy stories out there, right?
Sure! Let's go look for a few!!!
Looking...
Looking...
Continuing to look...
Oh look, here's one now!
Heritage.org, 2012: President Obama’s Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures
So far, 34 companies that were offered federal support from taxpayers are faltering — either having gone bankrupt or laying off workers or heading for bankruptcy. This list includes only those companies that received federal money from the Obama Administration’s Department of Energy and other agencies. The amount of money indicated does not reflect how much was actually received or spent but how much was offered. The amount also does not include other state, local, and federal tax credits and subsidies, which push the amount of money these companies have received from taxpayers even higher.
...
The 2009 stimulus set aside $80 billion to subsidize politically preferred energy projects. Since that time, 1,900 investigations have been opened to look into stimulus waste, fraud, and abuse (although not all are linked to the green-energy funds), and nearly 600 convictions have been made. Of that $80 billion in clean energy loans, grants, and tax credits, at least 10 percent has gone to companies that have since either gone bankrupt or are circling the drain.
"Circling the drain". Now there's a visual image that says so much about the President's Executive Branch leadership in general - but as this is a post about Green Energy, let's stick to this singular 'drain', shall we? Yes, we shall!
According to the Heritage.com article referenced here, the President set aside $80 BILLION for the Green Initiatives which were to kick-start the creation of the 5 MILLION high-paying jobs (as described in the section above). Turning once again to my trusty calculator, this means that the President assumed (feel free to use the word 'hoped') that this financial 'shot in the arm' would yield 5 MILLION jobs on an initial investment of $80 BILLION.
When expressed Mathematically, this means the President ass-u-me-d that each job would cost (as illustrated by the following higher math example):
Green Stimulus Tax Dollars / Green Jobs Desired = Expected Cost per Job
$ 80,000,000,000 / 5,000,000 = $ 16,000 per job as budgeted
Therefore, the President 'hoped and changed' his way into thinking that he could create 5 MILLION high-paying, high-tech, high-profile Green Jobs by investing $16,000 per job in this "critically important" segment of the Nation's economy.
Contrasting the President's Objectives against his actual Performance we see the following:
Budgeted cost per job: $ 16,000
Actual cost per job: $ 11,450,000
Variance to budget: $ 11,434,000 Over budget per job created (or saved)
Jobs created (or saved): 2,298
Jobs created objective: 5,000,000
Variance to objective: 4,997,702 Jobs still not created (or saved)
Huh. That's interesting, isn't it?
President Obama underestimated the cost of each job created by 99.86026%
He overstated the number of jobs to be created by 99.95404%
From a purely mathematical perspective, if nothing else, the man is eerily consistent (hovering somewhere between 99.86 and 99.95% of the time he estimates job creation or costs...).
Admittedly, the President's 10-year window hasn't closed yet, he's still got almost six years to reduce the spending for each job created (by 99.86%) and increase the number of jobs created (or saved) from 2,298 green energy jobs to his personal objective of 5 MILLION.
He just needs a bit more time to continue his 'good work'.
A third-term, perhaps? (Thanks Daily Kos, for making sleep 'almost' impossible last evening)
No. I don't believe so. I believe that a man with the President's mathematical prowess should be working for a crime syndicate laundering drug money through a bowling alley, car wash, or perhaps, running a variant of our very own Internal Revenue Service (in Guatemala).
It is not that the President is incompetent at WHAT he is doing - he does what he does extremely well. The shame is, of course, is that what he is 'good at doing' is crashing economies, sewing discontent, riding rough-shod over The Constitution, using the power of the Federal Government to infringe upon the rights of the citizens, and completing Jimmy Carter's third term.
Remember when you wondered, "I wonder what would have happened if Jimmy Carter had WON a Second Term?" Wonder no more.
You're living it. (BONUS! "We're all in" for the third-Carter-term)
I may never sleep again...
Oops, I almost forgot... Regarding the title of this post? That $84.15 is the total amount you (and each single member of your family) contributed to the $26 Billion spent / guaranteed / wasted / whatever on green energy 'spend' referenced above divided by the total population of the United States.
If illegal aliens (oops, 'Undocumented workers') are included in this population number, you would necessarily receive more back (since only Legal Citizens should get a 'rebate' of Green Energy spending), but since 'Gangs' began patrolling the Halls of Congress, I'm thinking that we're pretty much ALL legal now.
One MORE 'Oops' before I go: IF we've 'only' spent $26 BILLION of the $80 BILLION allocated, look for an additional $54 BILLION to be spent for Green Energy projects over the next six years. Yes, I'm sure THESE dollars will be better-spent than their predecessors...
Yeah. Right.
Have a Green Energy Day!
Don't forget your fire extinguisher for your Fisker Karma! You'll need it...
Your tax dollars at work...
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Guns or Butter 2012 (a.k.a.: "Exporting Progressivism")
![]() |
| PHOTO: Whitehouse.gov |
.
In this example, a nation has to choose between two options when spending its finite resources. It can buy either guns (invest in defense/military) or butter (invest in production of goods), or a combination of both. This can be seen as an analogy for choices between defense and civilian spending in more complex economies. [Source: Wikipedia]
Not to be confined to traditional macroeconomic theory, President Obama has once again done what he always has done so frequently in his first term...
He added a third component to the economic 'model' referenced above.
The new-and-improved Obama 'Model' is no longer 'Guns vs. Butter', but rather:
"Guns vs. Butter vs. Ideology"
Surprisingly enough, the President's Ideology has trumped traditional, 'old, Bearded, White guy Economics' or, 'OBWGE' modeling.
Seriously, who saw THIS coming?
Well, off the top of my head, I'm thinking just shy of 50% of Americans who voted in the last election DID. You know, those racists (count me IN! as I didn't vote for the man) who were really hoping that this chuckle-head would not get re-elected to Jimmy Carter's third term.
Four more years of 'Turkey on Rye' with one heaping helping of 'Malaise' tossed in... But you know, this is probably just ME being racist, woman-hating, or right-wing 'extreme' and all...
Hey, but enough about ME!!!
Let's get back to the subject of today's post:
"Guns vs. Butter vs. Ideology"
While you were buying YOUR turkey, your stuffing, and your butter, your President and his Administration were hard at work doing what they do best...
Shrinking our National Defense capabilities AND [BONUS!] sending your money (we're borrowing) overseas to support 'Green Initiatives' in Indonesia and Brunei!!!
![]() |
| [MoosNote: Soon to be 'FEWER'] |
From the Examiner.com: Obama fires 20,000 Marines, promises billions to Muslim green energy
In an article published by San Diego, California's North County Times, Military Affairs reporter Gretel C. Kovach cites; "The Corps is shrinking by 20,000 Marines, to 182,100."
The North County Times also cited that America's premier fighting force is; "scraping to repair or replace battle-worn equipment.
In spite of the Nobel Peace Prize award winning Obama ordering a recent surge in combat troops the Afghanistan theater of war, Kovach also pointed out that America's beloved Marine Corps is still to be slashed by roughly 10 percent; "despite no sign of an enemy collapse."
Earlier this week, Breitbart.com covered the recent agreement Barack Obama has promised billions of Yankee dollars to the oil-rich and overwhelmingly Muslim nations of Indonesia and Brunei.
As reported, $6,000,000,000 worth of American taxes has been promised to the two neighboring nations to promote "green energy."
Many green energy companies in the United States, such as Solyndra and About Solar have been dismal failures despite the over $1,200,000,000 infusion of tax dollars from the Obama Administration.
From the Breitbart.com article: Obama Promises Six Billion For Green Energy In Asia
Yesterday the United States, Brunei, and Indonesia formed the US-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership for a Sustainable Energy Future, and President Barack Obama promised up to $6 billion for the green energy idea.
“The Partnership will offer a framework for consolidating and expanding energy and environmental cooperation across existing regional forums to advance efforts to ensure affordable, secure, and cleaner energy supplies for the region,” said the White House.
There are four specific priorities the Partnership wants to concentrate on: renewables and cleaner energy; markets and interconnectivity; the emerging role of natural gas; and sustainable development.
This is how the $6 billion will be split:
• The Export-Import Bank of the United States will launch a program to make available up to $5 billion in export credit financing to eligible countries in the region over the next four years to increase access to American technology, services and equipment for the implementation of energy infrastructure projects.
• The U.S. State Department will oversee a $1 million energy capacity-building fund to support partnership activities via project preparation and technical assistance
I feel the need for a sanity check coming on, please bear with me...
- We are giving these folks money so they can BUY 'green energy products' from U.S.?Isn't this akin to giving the stuff away for FREE? You know, since we're GIVING THEM THE MONEY in the first place? (i.e.: "Hey buddy, take my five bucks, you want to try our $5 Value Meal - you'll like it... Hey, dude where are you going with that five spot I just gave you?!?!") Does anyone really expect the 'loans' to be repaid?
- Indonesia is ranked 21st in the world in Oil Reserves - how come they're not solving their own energy issues? Did they ask for help, or did Obama just 'commit to give them stuff' like he so often does? ("Everyone gets an Obama Phone")
- Why all the love for the Muslim countries? How about a little love for Ireland Mr. O'bama? After all, you're Irish too, aren't you?
- Some funds will be used to study the evolving role of Natural Gas? [Moos Note: I LIVE in New York State - we are NOT ALLOWED to retrieve, explore, or otherwise use accepted technologies to extract Natural Gas IN New York State - why should I pay for them to do THERE what we can't do here???]
- Sorry, but WHY is the US State Department taking one-sixth of the budget for this? Does this mean that 1/6 of the total amount is going towards G&A expenses? That seems a 'bit' high, even for government work. The document above by Government Contract Associates says that the AVERAGE G&A should not exceed 11%. Sorry, but that's just basic 'Math'. And President Obama so loves his 'Math'...
In the end we have an expansion of what we've had before, the President of the United States attempting to define the 'winners' in our economy.
No longer content to steer national policy towards his 'Green Initiatives' he now extends the hand of friendship (while holding your American Express card in it) to Asian countries in an attempt to drive revenue toward his campaign donors, bundlers, core constituency groups, and other "FOO's" (friends of Obama's).
It's U.S. Liberal Progressivism gone... Global.
Don't worry, someone will come along and pay for it.
Some day.
Most likely it'll be your kids.
Send them off to school tomorrow and tell them everything will be okay.
You've lied to them before.
Remember when you told them about...
Broccoli?
Yeah, this almost EXACTLY like that, but instead of the broccoli 'passing' through them within 24 hours, this crap will be stuck in their gullets for their entire life.
Where's the Hope? Where's the Change?
Gone.
Now it's just 'Forward!'
But this time, in the Second Term, the World is his Oyster - an International 'more-of-the-same' Presidency.
Good luck chewing on THIS, kids...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








