Friday, January 25, 2013

Fire In the Sky

Boeing 787 Dreamliner - Dream a Little Dream of...  Me


Picture yourself in a seat on a airplane,
Above far away trees, flying through ice blue skies,
Somebody shouts, and you turn so slowly,
The stewardess with red-rimmed eyes...



Hot pokers of flames both orange and red,
Lick at the ceiling above your head,
Look for the Captain with fear in his eyes,
And he's gone...



Li-ion battery in the sky on fire,
Li-ion battery in the sky on fire,
Li-ion battery in the sky on fire, ahhhhhh!



"Hey kids, do you know what time it is?" asks the man standing in front of Mrs. Dimwiddy's Fifth-grade Science class.

"Time to call School Security?" laughs the boy with a full head of red hair and more freckles than Congress has debt.

"Ha, that's a good one Tommy!" says the man as he drapes his overcoat over the back of the wooden chair and sets his briefcase on the desk in front of the classroom.  "A funny answer, but unfortunately...  NOT correct!  Would anyone else like to take a guess?" he asks.

A tall girl with straight brown hair parted down the middle asks, "Is it time for us to discuss something which has something vaguely to do with, um...  Science?  Since this is Science class, you know..."

The man at the front of the class leans down, rifles through his bag and pulls something from his open briefcase and throws it to the girl.  "Very good Carol, it DOES have something vaguely to do with Science!  And because you guessed correctly, here, have an iPhone!!!  Just, um, don't turn it on just yet, okay?"

The kids, previously half-asleep, find themselves now sitting upright in their chairs, eyes wide-open and boring in on the man and the contents of his wonderous briefcase.  Each student wonders quietly to himself: 

"Does he have more stuff in that bag of his?"  

"Will I need to declare any gifts he tosses MY way on my W-2 via a 1099-MISC for next year?" 

"Did I forget to do my Math homework?  And if I did, do I CARE?"

"Will it be taxed at the rate for non-standard income?  Oh crap, if I get anything from this guy, I'll pay more in taxes than Warren Buffett!" 

"Whoa, what's that smell?  Did Barbara's Mom pack her an egg salad sandwich again for lunch?  Smells like somebody's been cooking possum in a boy's locker room after a football game every time she does..."

"Huh, you know, with that new iPhone in her hand, Carol's kind of pretty...  Wow, I wonder if she thinks I'm pretty too???"

[Meanwhile, back in the front of the classroom...]

"Ahem, kids, look back up here, pay attention, you are about to learn valuable scientific life lessons!"  The man gestures to Mrs. Dimwiddy who walks to the light switch and flips off the lights as the overhead project glows to life in the suddenly dark room.

"You see kids, there are many things in life which you need to learn about in order to be successful in life.  There are yet other things which you must know about...  To actually stay alive."  The man steps aside as the projector hums quietly and an image fills the white board in the front of the classroom.  "This is the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.  Has anyone heard of it before?"  

A short boy wearing a red plaid shirt and cargo pants jumps from his seat and shouts, "The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a modified 747-400 passenger airplane that can haul more cargo by volume than any airplane in the world.  Each Dreamliner is 235 feet, 2 inches long and has a wing span of 211.5 feet, with a cargo capacity of 65,000 square feet.   The final assembly point of the 787 is Everett, Washington."  He executes a brief bow and falls back down into his seat.  A second later he's back on his feet staring down into his hand, "Oh, and, the National Transportation Safety Board Sunday added a new twist to the high-profile probes of electrical malfunctions aboard a pair of Boeing Co.'s airliners by disclosing that the battery that caught fire on a parked Japan Airlines Co. jet earlier this month "did not exceed its designed voltage."  When finished he collapses into his seat with a huge grin on his face. 

The man at the front of the class leans back against the teacher's desk spreads his arms apart and asks the question he's been wondering since Jeff began speaking, "How did you KNOW all that?"

"I don't need an iPhone, I have a Samsung Galaxy S III, it rocks." the boy says as he holds the phone up for the visitor to see. 

"Well, yes, that is correct, the Boeing 787 has been 'lighting up' runways lately.  While no one is sure exactly WHY several of the planes have caught on fire, it appears to have something to do with the battery packs running the electrical systems on the planes.  According to the Huffington Post:

Airlines that have grounded the Boeing 787 continue to cancel flights as safety officials continue to investigate the planes' batteries to find the root cause of malfunctions that have caused an emergency landing, a fire and other problems."

Then he asks, "Can anyone think of any other modes of transportation which may be impacted by a similar battery 'issue'?" 

A hand shoots up in the back of the classroom, "Trains, because trains can be electric!  Right?", unsure of the answer, the boy in the back of the classroom retakes his seat.  He knows he won't be getting an iPhone based upon the frown on the face of the man in front of the class.

"Well, there are electric trains, but they are powered via a central generating hub, typically powered by coal or other reliable fossil fuels."  Mrs. Dimwiddy standing at the back of class clears her throat loudly at this comment.  "There are also diesel-powered trains, which can run on traditional diesel, or on environmentally-friendly 'bio-fuels' made from chicken fat, fryer grease, and the fat rendered from the bodies of Hollywood celebrities following lyposuction surgery."  he continues.

"Is that true?" asks a girl in the third row.

"Yes, Veronica, it is.  McDonald's fry oil, Burger King's 'pretty much anything on their menu', Purdue Over-Stuffer Roasters, Roseanne Barr, Gene Simmons, and / or Beyonce Knowles can each power federally-subsidized Amtrak trains.  Actually, looking at the folks listed, some can power 'more' than others. 

Jessica Simpson might get a train three yards down the track - Roseanne Barr, on the other hand, could alone pretty much power the Auto Train from Virginia to Sanford, Florida. 




Missing from this list, of course, is Michael Moore.  If this guy ever had lyposuction surgery he could power the US Navy Pacific Fleet, but I'm not sure that the military would ever buy the goo in this man's body.  And, I'm pretty sure he'd be an environmental hazard according to the strict guidelines of the EPA.  But mostly he'd be an affront the Navy personnel around the world." he concludes. 

"Can anyone else think of what type of transportation these batteries be found in?  Think "Shopping Carts with Windows" here..." as he says this he points to a Toyota Prius parked right next to the building.

"Oh, oh, oh, they use these batteries in CARS, right?" shouts a girl in the front row.

"Yes.  Yes, they do, as a matter of fact." he says as he turns back to the white board.

"Hey, Mister, where's my free phone?" the girl asks.

"Oh, gosh, sorry, I'm plum out of free phones.  Hey, how about a Fresca?" he asks, remembering the old line from Caddyshack.  "You need want a prize for answering a question for which I pointed out the answer to you?  What do you think I am, a lackey for the NEA?" 

"I think you're a cheapskate..." the girl mutters as she retakes her seat.

"Okay, yes, so we have established automobile manufacturers also use lithium-ion batteries for their hybrid and EV vehicles.  So why would we be putting batteries which can catch fire, explode, or spontaneously combust into YOUR car?" he asks.

"Because you're a LIAR?" asks the girl who 'didn't get a phone'.

"Oh, I'm sorry, you would be wrong.  I may be cheap, but I never lie." says the man as he points to a slide which has just appeared on the white board.  "This is from Wikipedia, the place from which most of you copy, um, I mean, do your independent research for your homework assignments":


Recalls
 

In March 2007, Lenovo recalled approximately 205,000 batteries at risk of explosion. In August 2007, Nokia recalled over 46 million batteries at risk of overheating and exploding. One such incident occurred in the Philippines involving a Nokia N91, which uses the BL-5C battery.
 

In December 2006, Dell recalled approximately 22,000 laptop batteries from the US market. Approximately 10 million Sony batteries used in Dell, Sony, Apple, Lenovo/IBM, Panasonic, Toshiba, Hitachi, Fujitsu and Sharp laptops were recalled in 2006. The batteries were found to be susceptible to internal contamination by metal particles during manufacture. Under some circumstances, these particles could pierce the separator, causing a short-circuit.

...

Transport restrictions
 

In January 2008, the United States Department of Transportation ruled that passengers on commercial aircraft could carry lithium batteries in their checked baggage if the batteries are installed in a device. Types of batteries affected by this rule are those containing lithium, including Li-ion, lithium polymer, and lithium cobalt oxide chemistries. Lithium-ion batteries containing more than 25 grams (0.88 oz) equivalent lithium content (ELC) are exempt from the rule and are forbidden in air travel. This restriction greatly reduces the chances of the batteries short-circuiting and causing a fire.
.
Additionally, a limited number of replacement batteries may be transported in carry-on luggage. Such batteries must be sealed in their original protective packaging or in individual containers or plastic bags.
 

Some postal administrations restrict air shipping (including EMS) of lithium and lithium-ion batteries, and products containing these (for example: laptops, cell phones). Among these countries and regions are Hong Kong, Australia and Japan.
 

On 16 May 2012, United States Postal Service (USPS) began a ban of shipping anything that contained a lithium battery to an overseas address due to fires resulting from transport of batteries. Because of this restriction, it became exceptionally difficult to ship anything containing them to military troops or personnel stationed overseas, due to the USPS being the only method of shipment to these addresses. The ban was lifted on 15 November 2012.
 

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner contains lithium cobalt oxide batteries which are more reactive than newer types of batteries.


"So the batteries that they're using to run critical systems on the Boeing Dreamliner today were illegal to bring on a plane prior to November 15, 2012?  And, now, they are POWERING the critical systems of the plane that they used to be banned on?" a boy from the middle row asks. 

"Ah, what a bright boy you are!  Here, have an iPad!" the man says as he lobs an iPad at the boy.  [In the front row of the classroom a girl without a phone shoots the man an icy stare...]

"But, what do they mean when they say that the Dreamliner has lithium cobalt oxide batteries which are 'more reactive than newer types of batteries?  Is this a good thing, or a not so good thing?" the boy asks.

"Well, hold on there little buddy, I've got a Mac PowerBook 4 for you!" in the front row a girl slides from her chair onto the floor where she begins to sob loudly.  "Returning once again to your homework source, Wikipedia, you will find the following information:

Thermal runaway refers to a situation where an increase in temperature changes the conditions in a way that causes a further increase in temperature, often leading to a destructive result.

It is a kind of uncontrolled positive feedback. "

"Yes, kids, the hotter the battery gets, the, um, 'hotterer it continues to get' until a 'Destructive Result' occurs..." says the man as a new slide appears on the white board.  "Like this one.  Say 'Hello' to a destructive result on a brand spanking new - Boeing 787."

Photo:  BostonHerald.com
  
"So car companies are putting these batteries into Electric and Hybrid cars too?" a boy in the back of the class asks.

"Yes, yes they are!" the man says as he begins to re-pack his briefcase and hefts his overcoat back up from the chair.

"But, why would they do this?" asks Jeff.

"Because they HAVE to.  The Federal Government issues guidelines which Automobile Manufacturers must abide by.  These are called CAFE standards.  If the automaker does not meet these mileage objectives, they will be forced to pay huge fines and the very real possibility of embarrassing stories about their companies in the Media." the man shrugs into his overcoat and begins to pull on his leather gloves.  "They are using the current battery technology because they have to do something to comply with the regulations compelled by the President and Congress.  It's cheaper to have a few lawsuit payouts from fires than it will be to pay the fines of non-compliance with CAFE guidelines."

"What?  That's it?  You tell us about this and then you leave?  What's up with that?" asks the boy peering over the display of his new Mac PowerBook. 

"Hey, kiddo, don't get mad at me because I told you about the problem - get mad at the people who DIDN'T tell you what was going on.  Start with professional News people, work your way to Congress, the NTSB, EPA, and then up to the White House.  Ask questions and demand answers of them, not from some guy who writes blog posts in his PJ's in the dead of night.  I just came here today because I heard somebody was giving away free Apple 'stuff'.  If your teacher had told me that I had to buy the gear to give away, I probably would have slept in.  Hey, here's another 'life lesson' for you, next time, ask more questions before you agree to do something for someone." the man says as he lifts his briefcase from the desk and begins walking to the door.

In the darkened classroom there is a burst of blue flame, a hint of ozone, and the scream of a girl.  "I told you to wait until I left the classroom before you turned that iPhone on...  Some of them, too, have burned up.  Looks like you got one of THOSE.  Oops.  It only takes one bad Apple to, ah, never mind."

The kids turn to watch him leave the room as the teacher switches the overhead lights back on.  "Any questions kids?" 

Hands go up throughout the classroom as the teacher leans back on her desk and lets out a long sigh.

It's going to be a long day for her.



Good.
 
UPDATES:
 
January 25:   The FAA certified the 787 battery system even though lithium ion batteries are more susceptible to catching fire when they overheat or short-circuit than other types of batteries.
 
Securaplane, an Arizona company that won a contract to design a battery charger unit for the Boeing 787, had a fire in November 2006 that ignited when the battery used by an engineering technician exploded during testing, destroying the firm's labs and production building, according to a summary of findings prepared by an administrative law judge who heard a whistleblower complaint filed by the technician.

The technician went to court after he was fired.

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Fifty Shades of Hay


A few weeks ago my wife came home and told me that she heard about a book from the "Girls at work" that she thought she might buy.  Why?  Because it was about 'relationships', of course.  Sure, after a mere 48 years of marriage, my wife wants to learn about "Relationships".

Really?  Relationships?  I'd have thought she'd have ENOUGH of relationships by now (being married to me).   

The premise of the book, she told me was different than 'regular romance novels' as it had to do with, she believed, relationships regarding people who were older - presumably like US.  

"Why do you believe it's about 'crabby old people' relationships?", I asked.

"Because of the title of the book, and what the girls at work were saying, of course." she replied.

"This wouldn't be that "Fifty Shades of Gray" series, would it?" I wondered aloud.

"Oh, so you already know about it?!?!" my wife asked with her eyes widening.  She seemed happy to learn that I had a CLUE as to another topic (besides politics) on which we could 'share'. 

"Yes.  After 57 years of marriage, you, above all other people, should KNOW that I 'know everything' by now."  I said.  

[Note to self:  Dig out old wedding invitation and find out how long we actually HAVE been married.  "57 Years?"  Is that all?  Some days seems like longer than that - well, at least for her.]

"Oh yeah, sometimes I forget, but you're always there to remind me, aren't you?" she replied.  

"Uh-huh.  And just so you know, that book you're talking about isn't really about 'normal relationships', at least based upon the comments from the hens I hear clucking around the blogyard at work.  Well, not unless being restrained, tied up, and otherwise 'in bondage' is something you feel good about, of course." I said. 

"Oh, I didn't know that." my wife said.  

"I was kind of hoping that you didn't." I said.  "Because after 63 years of marriage, I don't know if my system could take the shock of finding out that I was married to some kind of lunatic pre-vert."

I found the following 'plot summary' excerpt online (where else?) and showed it to my wife:   

"The tension between Ana and Christian eventually comes to a head after Ana asks Christian to punish her in order to show her how extreme a BDSM relationship with him could be. Christian fulfills Ana's request, beating her with a belt, only for Ana to realize that the two of them are incompatible. Devastated, Ana leaves Christian and returns to the apartment she shares with Kate."

Oh, for the love of God, someone, please, stick pins in my eyes.  Yeah, this is what I want my wife (or anyone for that matter) reading in their spare time.  Turns out that this book and its requisite spin-off sequels have outsold the Harry Potter series of books worldwide.

[SIGH]  

Whether my wife actually knew what the book was about or not, I don't know.  But I suspect that if 'the girls at work' were talking about this GREAT READ about relationships, my wife is smart enough to 'read into' the storyline as to what the heck they were talking about.  

Perhaps she only heard a 'bit of their conversation' vs. the whole "Whip me, beat me, hurt me, show me how much you care!" plot?  

I'd like to believe this is the case.  

In the end, after 72 years of marriage, I still don't read 'her stuff' and she doesn't read 'mine' (I'm hoping this rule extends to this post).  So if she was thinking she was going to sneak some middle-aged-Twilight-Saga-sado-bondage-relationship stuff into our house, I guess that I wrecked this bit of erotica for her.

Just one request of you if I may?  If you ever call my house and my wife tells you that I can't come to the phone because, "He's all tied up at the moment..."  

Call 911.

Thanks.

Monday, January 14, 2013

Cars (Part III)

Photo:  General Motors

At last we come to the end of the past week's "Cars Trilogy"...  On par with such epic adventures as, "The Lord of the Rings Trilogy", "Back to the Future I, II, and II", and "The Bad News Bears" (yes, Classics each), we find ourselves at the end of the "Cars" series of posts and we are left wondering, "How will it end?", "What happens next?", and "For the love of God, will you ever post Part Three so I can get back to reading the "OMG!" page on Yahoo!?"

Well, wait NO MORE!  The epic "Cars Trilogy" of posts ends now!!! 

Well, not exactly right now, more of as in, "Very shortly ending once I get past this bit of prologue... right now!"

This officially marks the BEGINNING OF THE END of...  The MoosRoom Cars Trilogy" (Please hold your applause 'till the end - thank you!)

In "Cars - Part I" we learned that obscure federal and state agencies are working hard to come up with innovative ways to bill YOU for the miles you drive for work and play (because you shiftless Americans are NOT taxed enough already).  

YOU have been buying Electric and Hybrid Vehicles (and collecting those Federal Tax Rebates all the while) resulting in lower gas tax revenues required to maintain our 'aging highway infrastructure'.  Yes, I know that the $866 BILLION Stimulus bill was intended to do all this and more, but turns out...  It was only kidding.  That $866B mostly went to Unions.   You don't like it, call Jimmy Hoffa and tell him about it - sorry. 
.

In "Cars - Part II" we learned that the NHTSB wants EV's, Hybrid Vehicles, and Oxen-Pulled-Wagons to 'Make more noise' because they are too dang quiet, especially when the oxen are wearing PETA-sanctioned-organically-grown and environmentally-friendly footwear (a.k.a.:  Ollie Ollie Oxen Frees).  AND that since the Feds have been paying taxpayers a 'Rebate' to BUY Hybrids and EV's (okay, so I made up the Oxen Wagon 'thing'. 
.
It's NOT approved yet, that legislation is held up in the Senate currently) I felt the Feds ought to pay reparations to the 2,800 Americans (their number, not mine) 'per model year' injured when stepping in front of a 'SBD' (Silent Butt Deadly) Electric Vehicle.

All caught up?  Excellent!  We now begin the official beginning of... 





"Cars  - Part III"    

For years the friendly folks in the Federal Government have been handing out tax credits (i.e.:  taking taxes from YOU to give someone else a tax credit for doing something the Feds like) to the wealthiest Americans who have the foresight (and sizable enough bank account) to buy either an EV or Hybrid automobile.  

Why do I say the 'Wealthiest' Americans ("Holy smoking gun of the Richest 1% Batman!!!")?  Because most folks can scarcely afford a new gas-powered auto let alone the bleeding-edge cost of an EV or Hybrid vehicle. I wish someone would look at an honest comparison between high mileage gas-powered vehicles and their 'environmentally friendly green' counterparts, the EVs and Hybrids.

Oh, look, someone DID...

January 4, 2013, Bankrate.com:  
Are High-MPG Gas Cars Better than Hybrids?     


If a buyer springs for a high-mpg gas car, savings in fuel costs can be substantial. At current gas prices, a vehicle getting 30 mpg will save its owner $838 at the gas pump per year and $4,190 over five years, when comparing to a car that gets 20 mpg and if the gas price is $3.35, according to the Department of Energy.
.
But not all fuel-efficient cars are created equal when it comes to making up for their higher sticker prices, according to a recent TrueCar.com study commissioned by The New York Times. Only two hybrids in the study, the Lincoln MKZ the Toyota Prius, made up for extra costs in a short time (1.2 years and 1.8 years, respectively.)  

Other hybrids took up to a decade or more to make up the cost, with the Chevrolet Volt taking as much as 27 years.


...

It's the Little Things


Shoppers should not only consider a car's mpg, but also smaller features that can increase fuel savings. The way we drive, such as how we accelerate, affects how much fuel our cars use. New models are coming out with gauges showing how efficiently the vehicle is being driven, with the hope that it will educate drivers on maximizing fuel economy.


"No one really recognizes how much of a difference your driving can make on efficiency," says Joe Wiesenfelder, an executive editor at Cars.com.




Building a Better High-mpg Car

Vehicles are able to get more miles per gallon in part because of the materials they are now being made of. Companies are making vehicles lighter, turning to high-strength steel, aluminum and carbon fiber composites -- materials that weigh less but are strong enough to perform well in crash tests. Cars 10% lighter can boost fuel economy 6% to 8%, according to the Department of Energy.


Automakers are also making cars more aerodynamic and are investing in turbochargers, which are low-weight options for making an engine operate more efficiently and produce more power.


This emphasis on speed and power for high-mpg vehicles is a big shift from 10 years ago, when high-mpg cars relied on cheaper materials and weaker engines. Today, one can generally expect them to perform as well as their standard mpg counterparts.


"In many cases, there's no difference in how they perform," says Wiesenfelder. "It's not like the days when you were buying the smaller, weaker engine."



Huh, how about that?  In the past ten years, automakers have responded to the rising cost of fuel by building vehicles which get better gas mileage?  Who'd have thought it?  

Oh yeah, I know a few of you are shouting at your monitors, "Hey Cow Guy, but that's only because the Federal Government MAKES them do it via the aggressive CAFE standards put in place by President Obama!!!  So how about that?!?!?"  

Not so fast Buffalo Breath - let me ask you this:  How about the CAFE standards beefing up mileage requirements approved in 2007 - were they Obama's idea too?  Oh, that's right, it was President G. W. Bush in the White House - so if you're going to give anyone credit, please feel free to give it to him, okay?  AND since technology does not turn on a dime, the ramp up to recent MPG improvements to automotive design takes years, rather than months. 
.
What are CAFE standards?  
(Please note the following excerpt has nothing to do with the school lunch program.  Thank you!) 
The following from Discovery.com provides a good overview:  Why are carmakers going green all of a sudden? In short, they have to, because Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards are getting tighter and tighter.

CAFE is the average miles per gallon of a car company's entire fleet of cars and trucks that each weigh less than 8,500 pounds (3,856 kilograms). Basically, these are minimum fuel economy standards that a car company must meet using its entire fleet of models averaged together.  And those standards got tougher in 2007 and 2009 with the goal of bringing the average up to 35.5 miles per gallon (15.1 kilometers per liter) by 2016.

 

The nasty part of CAFE standards is that if a manufacturer's auto line is NOT compliant with the average MPG requirement, they will necessarily produce small, cheap, shopping-cart-sized vehicles to bring the overall gas mileage of their fleet up.  Those who do not get their MPG's in line with the standard face 'Stiff Fines' from the Feds.  

These 'Stiff Fines' will be passed along to you, the car-buying public.  Oops, once again, if it feels like a 'Tax', it most likely IS a tax.  In the end - you will always pay for whatever the government demands.  Thanks for playing!

If you followed the link above, you noticed that the original article was posted on bankrate.com and re-linked by FoxBusinessNews.com.  There will be those who say, "Sure, ANOTHER Fox pack-o-lies perpetuated by the lying liars in the Low Life Lying Liars in the MoosRoom!!!"  

And to you, I say...  "Hay."

As in, "Hay, look, I found something on GreenCarReports.com that says pretty much the same thing as those wascally wabbits over at Fox Business... 


Hybrid, or Just High MPG?
The new breed of turbocharged gasoline cars will also reward you. Many achieve 40 mpg in gentle highway driving, but offer pleasing punch when you reach a twisty road. And let's face it, gasoline engines are still more tuneful than their diesel counterparts.


Hybrids perhaps lag behind on this factor, though that depends on the car you buy--there's a lot of fun to be had driving cars like the Lexus GS 450h. And the sporty little Honda CR-Z hybrid even has a manual gearshift option, for driving purists.



In the end, the market will decide (in spite of governmental 'bets') which manufacturers and vehicles win market share.  A Chevrolet Cruze 'Eco' gets roughly the same MPGs as a Chevrolet Volt on the highway.  The major difference is that there's no tax credit on the Cruze, and the cost of the vehicle is approximately one-half that of the Volt.  

So which would you buy, all things being even?  

I don't believe that the government should be in the business of attempting to pick 'Winners' and 'Losers' in private-sector enterprises.  GM and Ford (I personally don't care about Chrysler as they're not really American any longer) will make decisions based upon the market based upon feedback from consumers.  

If we're not buying something (go visit you local Chevrolet dealership and check out his inventory of 2012 Silverado trucks - oh yeah, they got them - they got LOTS of 'em in stock) they'll reduce production - well, in this case, they SHOULD HAVE reduced production sometime back in August based upon their current inventories in 2013.

I was sooooo close to finishing this post when I received a link which, I believe, will be the perfect epitaph for this one. 



Obama Administration Scaled Back on Electric Vehicle Purchases in 2012 -- January 14, 2013, Plugincars.com
In 2011, President Barack Obama's administration set a goal of purchasing only so-called alternative-technology vehicles for its fleet by 2015, but in 2012, the administration reduced its purchases of hybrid and electric vehicles by one-third, following a trend that's been ongoing for three years straight.

The statistics were reported last week by Detroit Free Press, which obtained numbers under a Freedom of Information request from the U.S. General Services Administration.

...

In 2009, the federal government purchased 8,139 hybrid or electric vehicles. That figure dropped to 6,467 in 2010—and fell to a disappointing 2,645 units in 2011, before dipping to 1,801 in 2012. That is a 32 percent decrease in 2012 (compared to 2011), representing only 3.6 percent of the 50,114 vehicles purchased by the federal government last year. Overall, vehicle buying by the federal government dropped by 8.6 percent in 2012.



...

If the Obama administration intends to follow through on its plan to purchase only alternative-technology vehicles for government fleets by 2015, then this downward trend will need to be reversed in 2013.

About 54 percent of the 1,801 alternative-fuel vehicles purchased by U.S. government agencies last year were built by Hyundai, Toyota, Mitsubishi and Honda.   


Oh President Obama, yet another promise broken to all those 'Greenies' out there - they're not going to like that.

Just another "Do as I say - Not as I do" from the friendly folks of the Federal Government.

Boom.  Done.

An appropriate end...

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Cars (Part II)

Photo:  Associated Press

We learned yesterday in "Cars (Part I)" that States are scrambling for revenue to maintain their aging infrastructures (roads, bridges, etc.).  As a result, they're working on innovative ways to collect additional taxes (from you) based upon how many miles you drive annually.  These 'new' (and improved?) taxes will presumably be dedicated to fixing the aforementioned highways, doing bridge maintenance, and perhaps filling in the roughly 11,697,001 pot holes in our highway system.  The 'last 001' pothole referenced here appears in the street at the end of my driveway. 

The reason that the States (and Feds) find themselves in such financial turmoil regarding highway maintenance is two-fold:  

First, with the 'Hope and Change U.S. Economic Recovery' on life support, people aren't driving as much as they used to, and, 

Second, those people who are driving are buying more fuel-efficient vehicles since gas prices have been flirting on and off with historical high prices for YEARS.  

In the end, it turns out that the Federal Government is guilty of meddling in the free market (hard to believe, isn't it?) as it has been giving financial incentives for people to buy EV's and Hybrid vehicles. 

The logic here is that with more vehicles getting better gas mileage, people are buying less gas, and...  There is less revenue to maintain the Nation's roads via gas taxes.  Once again we have proof-positive that the Law of Unintended Consequences is alive and well, and is nestled comfortably in Washington, DC.  
.
Today's post is a bit different, yet related, to the situation with EV's and Hybrid vehicles.  This is the spawn of a post I found on the Huffington Post which discussed another bit of regulation 'necessitated' by the proliferation of Electric-powered vehicles.
.

 
About the Detroit Electric Vehicle:  Production of the electric automobile, powered by a rechargeable lead acid battery, began in 1907. For an additional $600.00, an Edison nickel-iron battery was available from 1911 to 1916. 

The cars were advertised as reliably getting 80 miles (130 km) between battery recharging, although in one test a Detroit Electric ran 211.3 miles (340.1 km) on a single charge. Top speed was only about 20 miles per hour (32 km/h), but this was considered adequate for driving within city or town limits at the time.
.

In actuality, the Detroit Electric Vehicle has nothing to do with the remainder of today's post, but I just thought it is an interesting that the Federal Government is subsidizing the sale of vehicles (to the wealthiest 1%!) based upon a premise approximately 105 years old.  

What technical innovation is next for Federal Subsidy?  Windmills from the 1600's re-packaged as the NEXT BIG THING(!)? 

Oops sorry, I didn't mean to make you sad...  I'll move on now.


Okay, so here's the actual article I found this morning on the Huffington Post that began my wheels turning...
 .
DETROIT (AP) — A U.S. government safety agency wants electric and hybrid vehicles to make more noise when traveling at low speeds so pedestrians can hear them coming.


The cars and trucks, which are far quieter than conventional gasoline or diesel-powered vehicles, don't make enough noise at low speeds to warn walkers, bicyclists and the visually impaired, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Monday in a statement.


The proposed rule would require the cars to make additional noise at speeds under 18 miles per hour (29 kph). NHTSA says the cars make enough noise to be heard at higher speeds.


Automakers would be able to pick the sounds that the cars make from a range of choices. Similar vehicles would have to make the same sounds. And the government says pedestrians must be able to hear the sounds over background noises.


NHTSA estimates that the new noise would prevent 2,800 pedestrian and cyclist injuries during the life of each model year of electric and hybrid vans, trucks and cars.


The rule is required by the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act that was passed by Congress in 2010.



Summing Up:

  • The Federal Government incentivizes Hybrid and electric vehicle sales to save energy, save the Earth, save the Baby Harp Seals - yeah, whatever...
  • The unintended consequence of this is that people 'MAY' be run over by really quiet vehicles at their local street corner - increasing the costs for first responders AND the costs associated with unioninzed 'body part clean up crews' across the nation.  Hey, wait one minute - shouldn't states bill the Federal Government for these federally-mandated deaths and their related 'clean up' on local streets?
  • AND, once the Feds mandate that silent cars make noise, they'll prevent EXACTLY 2,800 pedestrian and cyclist injuries during the life of each 'Model Year' of vehicle
  • If we accept this last 'fact' as Gospel, the converse is, of course, that Federally-Subsidized EV and Hybrid vehicles are currently injuring 2,800 people (at least) per model year.  Shouldn't someone be suing the Feds for giving tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans to INJURE other Americans?  Something in my gut tells me the resounding answer to this is, "Yes!"
  • You think that last one is bad?  Try out this one for size:  What if the 'Federally Approved' EV and Hybrid car 'noise' exactly replicates the mating call of the endangered Ozark big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii ingens)  causing bats to drop from above and crash into unsuspecting Chevrolet Volts, startling drivers and causing them to accelerate suddenly pulling the wheel to the right toward a group of school children in uniforms being led to the library by elderly bespectacled Nuns from the local Catholic Elementary school?  Yeah, what about what THAT happens -  how will the Feds legislate, and pay for getting all those body parts off the street?   Hmm?

You see, when it comes to the Federal Government mandating or prohibiting (pretty much ANYTHING...), the process never ends.  There's always a follow-on bit of legislation that someone forgot to either add, or remove while the law is being pushed through the Congress faster than a drunken hooker leaving the Congressional Cocktail Lounge. 

Should people be allowed to drive EV or Hybrid vehicles which produce more toxic-waste by-products in the production and disposal of their 'batteries' than in the manufacture, and daily use of traditional 'gas-powered' vehicles?  Luckily for you, that's not up to me to decide.  Shoot, if it was up to me we'd all be flying around in Jetson cars (equipped with assault weapons just to tick off the Administration).

I do have an actual suggestion for the folks in DC.  Since they are allowing us 60 days to comment on what sounds should come from vehicles slowing down or speeding up at an intersection, I once again turn my eyes skyward to submit my personal favorite, the "Jetson Space Car" sound, courtesy of Hanna Barbera, 1960-something...


   



.
If, however, Hanna Barbera won't part with the Copyrighted Jetson sound (thereby allowing the wanton slaughter of Nuns and Children across America), I have a second suggestion, from Steppenwolf...
 
 


Yeah, you hear this "Get your motor running!" coming at you while waiting at a street corner, you'll know to get out of the way...

Happy Motoring America!  And please, help US save the Nuns and Young Catholics next time you go to the polls... 

As for those baby harp seals?  Well, we've got GreenPeace for that.  Right?   

A sincere thank you for NOT wanting to kill Nuns and children.  You're my kind of guy / gal.  You are a good person, unlike the Federal Government, which DOES want our streets littered with Dead Bats, small uniformed body parts, habits and broken rosary beads.